Loading…
Loading…
Technical evidence from PrismDiscover, PrismStrike, PrismMLScanner, PrismSecure, and PrismObserve flows automatically into EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, HITRUST AI Security Certification, CBUAE, SAMA, and dozens more — continuously.
AI GRC Frameworks
Audit Packages
Compliance Posture
NIST Evidence Artifacts
Most organizations cannot adequately demonstrate AI compliance when asked. Traditional GRC platforms bolt on AI modules. AI governance tools cover a handful of frameworks. Manual mapping via consultants is expensive, slow, and outdated the moment the AI system changes.
EU AI Act + NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001 + CBUAE + SAMA + HITRUST. Organizations subject to multiple regimes end up running five overlapping programs end-to-end.
Consultant-produced PDFs and Excel mappings are point-in-time. Every framework update triggers manual remapping. Every model change invalidates yesterday's evidence.
Legacy GRC platforms map policy controls — but cannot ingest adversarial test results, layer change logs, ML scanner reports, or runtime drift records.
Automated ingestion from every PRISM module: Discover inventory, Strike adversarial results, PrismMLScanner reports, Secure SafeScore + layer logs, Observe drift + incidents.
A single technical artifact maps simultaneously to EU AI Act Art. 9, 15 and 17, ISO 42001 change management, ISO 23894 risk treatment, NIST AI RMF MANAGE, HITRUST AI Security Certification.
Continuous compliance posture updated in real time. Gaps surface with remediation routing to the responsible PRISM module. Regulatory change monitored continuously.
One-click audit packages for EU AI Act conformity assessment, ISO 42001 certification, HITRUST AI Security Certification, CBUAE / SAMA examination response — from the same evidence base.
ISO 42001, 23894, 27001, 5338, 5259, TR 24028/24368. NIST AI RMF, NIST AI 600-1 GenAI Profile, HITRUST AI Security Certification, FINRA, CPRA, Texas RAIGA, Utah AI. EU AI Act, GDPR Art. 22, Council of Europe AI. CBUAE, SAMA, SDAIA, QCB. MAS FEAT, Singapore Model AI, Japan AI. CERT-In, DPDP, MeitY, RBI. OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, OECD, WHO, EMA, Basel, IOSCO, APRA CPS 234, BIS.
Compliance evidence is what was technically measured — not manually claimed. Every PRISM activity updates framework controls in real time.
A single PrismSecure SafeScore or PrismStrike test result satisfies controls across EU AI Act, ISO 42001, ISO 23894, NIST AI RMF, and HITRUST AI Security Certification simultaneously.
Controls without supporting evidence are flagged and routed to the responsible PRISM module. Missing post-market monitoring → PrismObserve. Missing inventory → PrismDiscover.
EU AI Act conformity assessment, ISO 42001 certification evidence, HITRUST AI Security Certification, CBUAE and SAMA examination responses — from the same underlying evidence base.
As ISO 42001 updates, EU AI Act implementing acts publish, or CBUAE guidance evolves, PrismGovern updates control mappings and flags newly required evidence.
ISO 42001 fairness and explainability objectives (A.5.4, A.6.1.2) mapped to your control register with evidence legs — bias, fairness and transparency tracked as first-class controls, not left as gaps.
One evidence base. 40+ framework coverage. Compliance becomes a live state, not an annual scramble.
Technical evidence flows from PRISM modules to GRC controls automatically — no parallel programs.
Audit responses compress from weeks to hours. Gaps surface before regulators find them.
Regulatory change absorbed without rebuilding programs. Multi-jurisdictional reuse out of the box.
